Today, May 9, 2011, the anniversary of the Great Soviet people's victory over Nazi Germany. What does this mean?
now widely common belief, according to which Nazism and Stalinism are the phenomena of the same order. There appear many publications, according to which the USSR is responsible the Second World War, along with Germany. However, it seems to me that this is at best a lopsided view of history, at worst - its fake. On Russia today are projected views of the past. And looks very biased.
Russia, under international law, is the successor USSR. That is correct. But not all governed by one law only. If we raise the Nuremberg trial materials, we will find a lot of uncomfortable as for Russia, for U.S. evidence. But is not the case. It's just different. And that's another - still the subject of discussions of historians, political scientists and court hangers-on.
This is another - the role and importance of the Soviet people to save the world from Hitler's regime. The term "Soviet people" for many years understood community of people are today and at the same table with each other will not sit down. Armenians and Azerbaijanis, for example. Ingush and Ossetians. You can continue, but it is not necessary. Because during the war these people were "Chained together, connected one end." And they have achieved this goal. Joint efforts. In that terrible time when loss of life without war hundreds of thousands.
In our country, decided to praise the heroism of soldiers winners emphasize the role of the Soviet Union in defeating Germany. And this is true, but it only part of the picture. Military victory is only the appearance of the conservation of living in the Eastern European mentality and identity standards - all that We usually are known collectively as the word "people".
Western Film vengeance beat plot "in the Second World defeat the Germans, all of America - the big concentration camp. " I watched several of these films. But for America overseas, it was the hypothetical possibility for us is very real. What would happen if The Germans would have won?
Germany would fulfill their concept of Lebensraum in the East "and planned to liquidate the Slavic peoples as racially inferior. Give a quote.
Himmler's Speech to the highest ranks of the SS and police in the field rate "Hegevald" under Zhitomir September 16 1942:
« For 20 years, we have to colonize the current eastern German province, from Eastern Prussia to Upper Silesia, as well as all General Government (Poland - VL). We need to Germanize and settle Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ingermanland (Leningrad and Pskov Region - VL) and the Crimea. In other areas we need to act this way: along the routes of military significance, along our highways, railways and airfields Network build a small city on 15-20 thousand people. Every city should have a garrison. Around him in a radius of 10 kilometers will be established German villages. This necklace settlements we move up to Don and the Volga and, hopefully, even to the Urals ... We, as the SS should ensure that established the German East, extending to the Urals. This will be a hothouse of German blood. Then, after 400-500 years in the case of possible conflict over the world at our disposal is not 120 million and 500-600 million Germans ».
Of note, prepared August 27, 1942 Head of colonization of 1-st Main Political Administration of the Ministry for the Occupied eastern regions Wetzel:
«a) First of all, necessary to provide separation of the territory inhabited by Russian, on the various political districts with their own authorities to ensure that in each of the separate national development ... inhabiting these areas must inspire them to under any circumstances not focused on Moscow, even if Moscow will sit the German Imperial Commissioner. Gorky Russian General Commissariat should be vaccinated feeling that he is somehow different from the Russian from Tula General Commissariat.
b) The second way is even more effective is weakening of the Russian people in racial terms. Germanization of all the Russian is impossible for us and is undesirable from a racial point of view ...
is important that the Russian Territory population mostly consisted of people poluevropeyskogo primitive type. This mass of racially inferior stupid people need it, as suggests an age-old story of these areas in the manual.
c) There are many ways to undermine the biological strength of the people.
aim of German policy will is to bring the birth rate from Russian to a lower level than the Germans. The same applies, incidentally, an extremely prolific peoples of the Caucasus, and in the future partly in Ukraine. While we are interested to increase the strength of the Ukrainian population, as opposed to Russian.
... we must consciously policies to reduce population. Means of propaganda, especially through the press, radio, cinema, leaflets, short brochures, reports, etc. we must constantly inspire people thought that bad to have many children ...
For us Germans, it is important to weaken the Russian people to such an extent that he was not able to prevent We set the German domination in Europe ...
If the Third Reich must be thousands of years, our plans should be developed in a generation. A This means that the racial-biological idea should be critical in the future of German politics ».
The archive of security police and SD were Poznań discovered notes gruppenshturmfyurera SS Hermann Krumvelya made after a meeting in Berlin in June 1943. The officer led the "colonization Center East ", virtually carrying plans of the Reich in Poland. These notes are, in fact, fragmentary phrases, which are badly decoding, but none However, they are indicative:
« Eviction ... Soviet Russia: the people ... this is not the people in the European sense, slaves ... Form a great empire, in parallel to evict with colonization. Duration - two or three generations ... Purpose: To complete Germanization throughout, and not occupation ... German tenants will receive the former Soviet enterprise.
To be evicted:
Jews - 100%
Poles - 80-85%
Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians - 50%
Galitsiytsy, western Ukrainians - 65%
Belarus - 75% »
Thus, we see that the Slavic peoples to be destroyed in two ways - by direct mass killing, and by creating conditions for the degradation of the people as an ethnos. This was the goal of Nazi Germany. Country in which the Nazi Party came to power entirely legitimate parliamentary means. Country in which the largest shareholders of industrial enterprises producing weapons were American capitalists. And these capitalists were not always the Anglo-Saxon bloods.
If Germany wins, the ethnic strife in the streets of our cities would have been an everyday reality. Would have been blocks of Ossetians, Ukrainians, Uzbeks fighting each other daily and fatalities.
If Germany had won, we would not have been the country that is now. Would not it be comprador bourgeoisie and thievish officials. They would not have been as civil authority would be carried out by German occupying Reichskommisariat.
It would not be "General allergen" Chubais, as his parents had been destroyed as racial inferiority. A mustachioed gentleman courtier Mikhalkov as usual shot to his "Great movie about the Great War" with the opposite sign, praising the heroism of the real Teutons in battle with the wild Slavic hordes.
If Germany had won, higher education in general would be unavailable Slavic boys and girls. And in our country would not be the secretaries and shop with university diplomas. Ravshanov-janitors and Jumshud-vacuum trucks also would not be - it would have been Ivans, Andrew Michaels.
look at the situation from the other side. What would happen if to Britain and the United States entered the war to Germany and showed its military superiority before the Soviet Army would have on German territory? Imagine what it would be based on our knowledge of life values \u200b\u200bas cultures and individuals.
In this case, Wolf talks with Dulles crowned would be successful. Germany would recognize defeat by the Allies and would join him in the war against the USSR. European and Far Eastern part of the USSR would have been occupied the same countries that occupied them in 1918 - the history would repeat itself.
Chubais would be the general manager of the fact that after 60 years would remain still on Soviet Union.
Novodvorskaya would be respected by the Ombudsman (or rather, ombudsvumanom) and read to all the world a lecture on "the corpse of the Soviet Union", "bloody gebne" and similar topics. Lectures have enjoyed great popularity - that's exactly what he wants to hear about the Russian public in the West.
think, exaggerating? No Here's a direct question: « Hitler's Germany, no doubt, had to be broken. For the sake of humanity, for the sake of the Germans. Hitler did not have to win. But the Soviet Union should was defeated, and Stalin, too, can give the victory. Defeat would have allies: Britain and the United States. And they would have done it. No one has Hitler would have the power and freedom, no one would have forgiven the Holocaust. Only - without us ». Quote taken from here .
Yakov Krotov would be appointed by the occupation authorities Patriarch of All Russian colony, as well as the ex-Soviet protectorates, and dominions.
Ruble would not have been the dollar, and students in compulsory commented to his emblem (a truncated pyramid with a Masonic eye) painted emigrated from totalitarian rule, Nicholas Roerich.
In any case, whatever branch of Western civilization is not a macro would win - the European as German or Anglo-American - Russian ethnic group would cease to exist. Ideologically and economically it was one of the world. And our people are well-understood it.
I understood at the level of government, and on the emotional-human level: see Grigory Alexandrov film "Meeting on the Elbe". Read the post-war prose Aleksei Tolstoy. With all the combat brotherhood of our people are well represented, one there they met. They're met by the same comrades, as well fought with the Nazis, somewhere nice and friendly, somewhere not so. But they were representatives of another world, another ideology. And it's not in the communist ideology of the USSR, antagonistic, by definition, to everything else. Case various standards of attitude towards life. Attitude toward his country and other countries. In individualism and collectivism.
All the nationalities of the Soviet people fought with the vanguard of Western imperialism. With native alien Slavic peoples thinking. Since the essential point of view, they fought not so much "For the Motherland, for Stalin," How much for the right to live as they lived before. Us against imposing alien standards of living and values. This idea is very irritable to the prevailing current in the power and personalities of historical science, the dominant thinking is that Western liberalism. But it's so and the perception of our people of the West is now quite similar to the end of 1930.
That is why even now the vast majority of the Russian concept of "patriotism" tantamount to the notion of "hatred for America." That's why the masses causes extreme irritation of the fact that children are members and governors studying in London. For Americans, the study of children in Europe - it's just learning. For the British study in the States - no more than ordinary students. In the minds of the same Russian Rights to send someone your child to study in the States - for high treason. And so it is perceived primarily because of the broad masses of the people is the belief that after studying in the West, the guys did not return to Russia. For, why did they go there? To go to the enemy with only one purpose - to treason. And the enemy of our enemy - our friend. Last point clearly illustrated by the following photograph, taken today, Ilya Varlamov on the streets of Moscow:
What does this have to the Victory Day? Yes, very direct. Sometimes, in relation to something nasty at the genetic level, we can hear the phrase "Our grandfathers did not for this died. That is, speaking this is a submission may partly unconscious, for which they died. Idea of \u200b\u200bhow it should be. It's all different. But one thing it is similar to (and including me) - our grandfathers died not for what we see daily in the country right now.
All veterans War, which I happened to know personally, differed with kindness, generosity, homespun Russian delicacy. They were human. They knew what was good and what is bad and hard to follow it. They acted on the principle of "Do as I" instead of "Do as I say." They did not have that anger and oskotinennosti, what can be observed in other veterans of the Afghan and Chechen wars. They were not so prevalent nowadays a fundamental understanding of their significance in the paradigm of "I served the Motherland = I do not have to." They were soldiers (that's right - with a capital letter) of his country, who went to defend it. And protect it is not so much to order, not so much because of the oath, how many from the depths of the soul - understanding the misanthropic nature of the aggressor. Realizing that the country is in danger. Realizing for what and with whom they are fighting.
Those who were in the rear, especially women, also lived in the mode of everyday everyday heroism. The stories of my grandmother, old ladies in the deaf Selizharovsky villages and Ostashkov districts of Tver Region, where I worked, show the simple and unsophisticated everyday heroism rear. The whole country was in war mode. The whole country was working to win.
So let's just going day to day to remember that the people with whom we are obliged to independence of our country, every day is getting smaller. And let us be more attention to them, mercy and compassion. And let them be good mood, as it is today in this old woman, which greatly embarrassed, when I met her photograph:
0 comments:
Post a Comment